Welcome to another post where I share a bunch of house rules that I use at my table. As always with these I'll Share the rule and talk a bit about why I use it and how it has worked out for us. Here is a link to Vol 2 if you're just joining us and wanna see more!
I know a guy: once per session a player may declare that they "know a guy". They are allowed to detail who this guy is, why it's relevant to what is happening right now, and what their connection to the person it. I will then roll 1d10. This is to determine the person's attitude towards the PC who knows them. a 1 is enemies, on sight conflict, and a 10 is good friends, lifelong allies.
This is a good tool for allowing the players to have just a little more influence on the setting. I feel strongly about the games being a group storytelling activity and your character should know people outside of the party. This is how you show what kind of friends your character had or has. In play I've only ever see one person try to abuse it but naturally the Judge holds veto power over any NPC proposed, so it is an easy thing to keep from being abused.
Magical Feedback: Wizard and similar casters start combat with a d4 in front of them, the "1" face indicated. Each round the wizard successfully casts a spell they increase this die by 1. This number is added to checks made by the wizard to cast spells. When this reaches a 4 the wizard suffers from magical feedback. They must make a roll-under check on their casting ability score or lose the ability to cast spells for 1d4 rounds. a pause of a single round resets this counter to 1. When this is at 4 and the wizard has successfully saved, it remains at 4 and a new check must be made each round they cast a spell.
This is another that comes directly from the Index Card RPG. I really love that book and feel that even if you don't play it, you will find something to take back to your table. Strongly recommend reading it. I really like this as just one extra little way a wizard can get spells off but also maybe dig too deep into the power they utilize and be left with nothing for a short time. This one I've really only used at a physical table but I really liked it when it was at our table.
Signature Spell: After a wizard determines their spell list, they then select one spell from that list to be their signature spell. Each time they cast this spell they add double their level to the check. Each level after 1st, they may add another spell to their signature spell list but may never select a spell that they have only just gained, it has to be a spell they have had before gaining the level. they cannot double select a signature spell.
This has always mostly served as a way to give the wizard just a little more juice, a way to tilt things in their favor on at least one spell early on. It also sort of lines up with a lot of appendix N, you see a lot of magic users in that who have spells they use over and over in favor of others. I don't find that it really changes much other than to add just a little more flavor to the character.
Research Spells: a wizard may have at any time 2 randomly determined "research spells". These spells are cast using a d14 instead of the usual d20. They also have 2 randomly determined mercurial effects. When a wizard gains a level they may automatically take one of their research spells as one of their new spells, selecting one of the mercurial effects and removing it and now casting it with the usual d20. A wizard may also gain access to these spells early through questing, repeated attempts to cast, or long research periods in down time. Finally, with one week of down time, doing no adventuring or exploring, a wizard may discard one of their research spells and randomly roll a new one.
This is a pretty recent addition to the rules and it hasn't seen a ton of play. When it did we had one guy who didn't cast one of his research spells ever but constantly failed to cast the second one and when he succeeded it usually came in clutch as he spell burned like crazy and borrowed some luck from a funny little kobold to get the spell off. It broadens the wizard's spells selections but doesn't make it easy on them. I like it a lot for this reason. It also means that there is a reason that the wizard somehow gains a new spell fully at each level. I know I took this from somewhere but I don't remember where I found it. If you know who did this first, please leave a comment below so I can credit them.
Second Wind: Any warrior or warrior adjacent class may begin combat with a d4 in front of them with the one showing. Each round they remain fighting they increase the facing on this die by one. when they die reaches 4, at the end of that round they may roll it and recover that many hit points, then reset it to one.
This is such a small amount of healing that it doesn't feel like it changes much but does allow a warrior to feel like a bad ass who is doing things like ripping off their shirt to bandage on the fly. It feels cinematic. This is yet another lifted right from the Index Card RPG (really, check it out!) and I've found that when I play in person it really encourages the warrior to play a little recklessly to try and get that extra little healing.
Change to mighty deeds: A warrior (and at my table only the human warrior) may choose three of the following things to apply their deed die roll to:
- Attack Damage
- Attack Roll
- AC
- Saves
- Damage ignored this round
- additional attacks: one additional attack for each time the number on the deed die is divisible by 3, rounded down, minimum 0.
This one I'm pretty sure came from Knights in the North, like a lot of the house rules I use today. So I said this one was only for the warrior at my table because humans in my setting are sort of rare. There are a few race-as-class options that gain a deed die and are their own version of warriors. So this is only for the human warrior to make them stand out just a little more but in the past I have allowed it for the non-human deed having classes and it works out just fine.
Well, That is another pack of my house rules. I think there might be one more volume of this where maybe I include a PDF with all of them together, kinda like how Judge AMP did over on Knights in the North. I Find that most of my house rules have integrated pretty seamlessly into the games I run and aren't often missed or forgotten. I generally approach with a philosophy of "does this make someone have more fun?" rather than "does this balance the game?" or "does this solve an existing problem?". I find that a rulings, not rules, approach deals with those other two questions a lot better than making a house rule for every little thing that comes up.
As always, Thanks for reading and I hope I gave you something to think about or take back to your table, if nothing else I hope you enjoyed reading!
No comments:
Post a Comment